home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: inforamp.net!usenet
- From: rmorin@inforamp.net (Randy Charles Morin)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C++ Compiler for Windows & DOS
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 03:23:15 GMT
- Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100
- Message-ID: <4l6meo$ah3@sam.inforamp.net>
- References: <4l0dpj$4kk@lal.interserv.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts47-12.tor.istar.ca
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- pfarley@gmu.edu wrote:
-
- >I'm in the market for purchasing a decent Windows/DOS C++ compiler. I've looked at Borland 5.0, but haven't heard too many
- >good things. Any other suggestions? I'm not doing any real fancy advanced compiling, just some college stuff.
-
- Borland C++ is far away better then Microsoft Visual C++ and nothing
- else is worth considering. Guess what I use. I use Microsoft Visual
- C++. Why? Because so does everybody else and you can't find regular
- work as a Borland 5.0 P/A because not enough companies use it. So
- there's your trade off. Do you wan't the best/easier compiler or do
- you want something that will lead to a career? Others will disagree
- with me. My opinion.
-
-
- Agrivar
-
- aka Randy Charles Morin,
- MiddleWorld SoftWare,
- Satisfying Your Bit and Bytes,
- Canada 1-800-363-3780
- Other 1-905-279-2087
- eMail rmorin@inforamp.net
-
-